
Trump’s 28-point Ukraine peace plan has leaked — and it would force Kyiv to give up more land, cap its military, and permanently give up on joining NATO.
Story Highlights
- Trump’s 28-point peace plan would require Ukraine to surrender more eastern territory and accept limits on its military size.
- The plan affirms Ukraine’s sovereignty but bars it from ever joining NATO, offering separate security guarantees instead.
- Trump advisors Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner personally walked President Zelensky through the plan on a speakerphone call.
- Ukraine has since rejected the original plan and is pushing for better terms, while U.S. officials say an updated framework is in progress.
What the 28-Point Plan Actually Says
The Trump administration’s 28-point draft plan to end Russia’s war in Ukraine was leaked in November 2025. The plan starts by affirming Ukraine’s sovereignty as its very first point. But it also demands that Ukrainian forces pull back from parts of the Donetsk region they still hold, caps the size of Ukraine’s military, and permanently blocks Ukraine from joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). In exchange, the plan offers security guarantees — including the right for the U.S. and allies to respond with military force if Russia attacks again.
Trump’s top advisors, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, delivered the plan directly to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a speakerphone call, reading through it line by line. The plan was also drafted with input from a Kremlin intermediary, which raised immediate concerns about whose interests it truly served. Critics on the left quickly called it a repackaging of Russian demands. But the administration pushed back, saying it gives both sides real security commitments — not just words on paper.
Ukraine Pushes Back, Talks Continue
Zelensky did not accept the original plan. Ukraine officially rejected it and demanded better terms. A Zelensky office official said the leaked 28-point document was no longer the active proposal. The U.S. and Ukraine then announced an “updated” framework, with both sides agreeing any final deal must “fully uphold” Ukraine’s sovereignty. Talks moved to Switzerland, where direct U.S.-Ukraine peace consultations were set to begin based on the revised plan.
Trump publicly hinted at “big progress” in the talks as negotiations moved forward. A senior U.S. official told NBC News that the updated plan focuses on giving both sides security guarantees to lock in a lasting peace. The administration has framed the whole effort as a serious attempt to end a war that has dragged on for years and cost both sides enormous blood and treasure — with American taxpayers footing much of Ukraine’s bill.
Trump’s Dealmaking Approach to World Conflicts
Trump has made ending wars a signature goal of his second term. From Ukraine and Gaza to the South Caucasus and Africa, his team has pushed hard for fast deals using economic pressure and direct negotiation — rather than the slow, process-heavy diplomacy of past administrations. This approach has drawn both praise and skepticism. Supporters say it gets results. Critics argue that deals built on territorial concessions without strong enforcement mechanisms tend to fall apart.
🇺🇦⚔️🇺🇸KIEV REJECTED DONALD TRUMP'S 28-POINT PEACE PLAN, DEMANDING BETTER TERMS FOR ITSELF – THE NEW YORK POST
According to sources, the Ukrainian side believes that the terms of a potential agreement should be revised in its favor.
Kiev also no longer considers the… pic.twitter.com/4R4Gy6aMU5
— dana (@dana916) July 8, 2026
For conservative Americans tired of endless foreign wars and blank-check spending in Ukraine, the Trump plan represents something different — a real attempt to get to yes, even if the terms are hard. No deal will be perfect. But after years of failed diplomacy and billions spent, Trump is at least forcing both sides to the table and demanding an answer. Whether Russia negotiates in good faith remains the biggest open question hanging over the entire effort.
Sources:
theamericanconservative.com, axios.com, americanprogress.org, theconversation.com, lemonde.fr, gwaramedia.com, bbc.com, aljazeera.com, justsecurity.org














