Wealth Tax Shock: Sanders-Khanna Go Big

Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna is pitching a “multi-racial New Deal” funded by new taxes on billionaire wealth to remake the economy and government programs.

Story Snapshot

  • Khanna says America needs “America’s next New Deal” with a racial focus and major wealth taxes.
  • He frames the plan as building a “cohesive multi-racial democracy,” echoing his recent interview and clips.
  • He promotes taxing billionaire wealth and expanding federal benefits like college and health care.
  • A March proposal with Sen. Bernie Sanders would levy a five percent annual wealth tax on top fortunes.

Khanna’s Pitch: A New Deal With A Racial Frame

Representative Ro Khanna of California used national media to argue that America needs “America’s next New Deal,” centered on race and redistribution. He said Democrats should embrace a progressive agenda and push an “economic realignment.” He tied the idea to a vision of a “cohesive multi-racial democracy,” signaling that race is a core part of the sales pitch, not a side note. Video clips of his Newsmakers appearance highlight the same theme and wording.

Khanna’s framing treats racial inequality and broad economic policy as one fight. He says the plan would answer today’s tech-driven economy and a wealth system that he claims favors the very top. He has linked this pitch to Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, but with a strong racial lens. He also frames the idea as urgent and historic, arguing the country must choose large federal action now to hold society together across lines of race and class.

How He Would Pay: Wealth Taxes And Bigger Federal Programs

Khanna backs new wealth taxes to finance large expansions of federal benefits. In March, he and Senator Bernie Sanders proposed the Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act. The bill would set a five percent annual wealth tax on the highest fortunes. The sponsors say the money would fund programs for working families and widen access to care, education, and other benefits through the federal government.

Khanna also promotes the idea on social media by citing the number of American billionaires and their share of wealth. He argues that taxing that pool can pay for free child care, free public college and trade schools, and earlier access to Medicare with added benefits. His posts frame the tax as a moral and practical fix for what he calls extreme concentration of wealth in a small elite.

Why It Resonates On The Left, And What It Means For Policy

Progressives have long linked wealth gaps and racial gaps, and Khanna places his plan in that lane. Academic work shows the racial wealth gap is large in historic terms. That research gives progressive politicians a data point to justify large changes to taxes and spending. They argue that new federal benefits can reduce gaps in assets, health, and skills across groups, while also reshaping power in the workplace and market.

Khanna also points to the legacy of the original New Deal to argue for reform. Researchers have shown that parts of New Deal housing policy helped lock in segregation by steering credit and benefits in ways that favored white neighborhoods. That history is often used to argue that any “next New Deal” must be race-conscious in design or it will repeat the same errors at scale.

Conservative Lens: Big Government, Bigger Bills, And Culture Framing

Conservatives will see a sweeping wealth tax and massive new benefits as the same old big government, only bigger. A federal wealth tax risks pushing investment away, and it invites endless fights over who counts as wealthy and what gets taxed. Families already face high prices from years of deficit spending. Adding new promises on top of that could strain growth and keep inflation pressures high, even as President Trump works to lower costs and restore energy strength.

There is also the culture frame. Calling America racist and then proposing a vast federal remake divides neighbors and distracts from practical fixes that help everyone. Securing the border, lowering energy costs, cutting waste, and getting people back to work unite the country. Building a fair economy does not require punishing savings or moving more power to Washington regulators. It requires freedom to work, safe streets, strong families, and local control that honors the Constitution.

Sources:

townhall.com, npr.org, youtube.com, khanna.house.gov, iheart.com